Skip to main content
NeuronFeed
CATEGORY

AI Agents startups (2026)

Coding agents are clearing 70%+ on SWE-Bench Verified — the rest of the agent stack is still arguing about reliability

414 ai agents startups tracked, with the largest concentration in US. Total tracked funding: $107.9B.

Tracked
414
Total Raised
$107.9B
Countries
34
Active Deals
12

Editor's picks

6

Top by score

View all 414 →

Funding by year — AI Agents

2020 → 2026
$3.1M
’20
$52M
’21
$357M
’22
$3.2B
’23
$23.0B
’24
$45.2B
’25
$29.0B
’26

Market overview

The SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard turned over four times in 2025 alone. Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 pushed the public ceiling past 77%, OpenAI's GPT-5 agent traces matched it, and Cognition's Devin shipped solo runs that closed real GitHub issues at scale. Cursor ($7.6B raised, $29.3B valuation) and GitHub Copilot still own the IDE seat, but the open question for 132 tracked startups is whether anything outside coding ever reaches the same reliability bar.

The reliability ceiling

GAIA, WebArena, and OS-World show the gap. Coding clears 70%+ on Verified; general computer-use agents — Anthropic's Computer Use beta, OpenAI's Operator, Manus AI's autonomous browser — sit in the 40-60% band on multi-step web tasks. Decagon ($296M Series B) and Sierra ($1.27B Series C) sidestep the ceiling by narrowing scope: they run customer-facing dialogue inside a tight tool surface where every action is logged and reversible. Cognition's Devin chose the harder path and competes head-on with Cursor and Augment Code ($252M) on async engineering work where a wrong commit costs real money.

Where capital is concentrating

The top of the funding table is mostly cross-listed labs — xAI's $56B and Mistral AI's $6.3B carry over from Foundation Models because both ship agent surfaces. Among pure agent plays, Cursor sits ahead of Cognition ($1.14B Series C, $10.2B valuation), Glean ($750M Series F), Notion AI ($343M Series C), and Imbue ($232M Series B). Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia, Thrive, and General Catalyst lead most rounds. Cline raised $4M seed and ships a VS Code agent that competes with $7B-funded incumbents — a useful proof that distribution and BYO-model flexibility still beat raw capital in this segment.

What 2026 actually decides

Whether agent reliability transfers. Coding works because compilers fail loudly, tests are cheap, and rollback is git reset. Booking a flight, filing an expense, or modifying a Salesforce record has none of those properties. The startups building eval harnesses, recovery loops, and explicit human-handoff UX — not the ones shipping flashier browser demos — are the ones likely to be alive in 18 months.

Key trends 2026

  • SWE-Bench Verified is the only benchmark anyone trusts. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5 agent traces both cleared 77%, but only on coding — GAIA and OS-World still sit 30 points lower for general computer-use.
  • Anthropic Computer Use, Operator, and Manus AI compete on the same OS-World task set. Public scores hover 40-60%; nobody has shipped a horizontal agent at coding-grade reliability yet.
  • Vertical narrowing beats horizontal autonomy commercially. Decagon ($296M) and Sierra ($1.27B) win deals by constraining tool surface; Devin and Augment Code win by going deep on engineering specifically.
  • Open-source agents punch above weight. Cline raised $4M seed, runs in VS Code, and ships against products with 1000x the capital — distribution still routes around funding.

Benchmarks vs global

SWE-Bench Verified ceiling
77%+
Claude Sonnet 4.5 / GPT-5 agent traces
OS-World general computer-use
40-60%
Operator, Computer Use, Manus AI band
Total funding tracked
$87.9B
second-largest category by capital
Companies tracked
132
43 US HQs (33%), 4 China

Top countries

By startup count

Stage breakdown

Latest round type
  • Seed 182
  • Series A 65
  • Series B 33
  • Pre-Seed 23
  • Series C 21
  • Series D 10
  • Series A Extension 3
  • Corporate 3

Top investors backing AI Agents

See all →

FAQ

Frequently asked

Which AI agents actually pass SWE-Bench Verified above 70%?
As of late 2025, Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 and OpenAI's GPT-5 both posted public agent traces above 77% on SWE-Bench Verified. Cognition's Devin reports comparable numbers on its full agent harness, and Cursor's Composer mode clears 60%+ in independent runs. Outside coding, GAIA and OS-World numbers for Operator, Computer Use, and Manus AI still sit in the 40-60% range — the reliability gap between code and general computer-use is roughly 20 points.
What separates AI Agents from AI Chatbots in this directory?
Chatbots reply; agents commit side effects. A chatbot drafts the email; an agent sends it, files the response in CRM, and books the follow-up. The same Claude or GPT model can power both — the difference is the scaffolding around it: tool registries, browser control, persistent memory, and recovery logic. NeuronFeed lists 132 agent startups separately from 50 chatbot startups because the buyer expectations and reliability bars are not comparable.
Why do investors keep funding coding agents specifically?
Coding is the one domain where agent failure is cheap and detectable. Tests run, compilers throw, and `git revert` exists. Cursor at $29.3B, Cognition at $10.2B, Augment Code at $977M, and Imbue at $1B reflect that revenue actually shows up — engineering teams will pay $20-40 per seat for a Copilot that ships PRs. No other agent vertical has a comparable feedback loop yet.
Is Manus AI competitive with Operator and Computer Use?
On public OS-World numbers, all three sit in roughly the same band. Manus AI scaled fastest on consumer demand in early 2025; OpenAI's Operator has the GPT-5 reasoning trace; Anthropic's Computer Use is the API path enterprises actually deploy. None of them are reliable enough yet for unattended 50-step workflows on production data — that gap is the central commercial bet of the category.
Where are agent startups concentrated geographically?
The US holds 43 of 132 published HQs (33%). China contributes 4 entries including Zhipu AI and Moonshot AI on the foundation side. Israel has 3, with Sweden, the Netherlands, and Czechia (JetBrains) at 1 each. The pattern mirrors AI Developer Tools — most of the agentic frontier is currently coding-focused, and that work tracks where the model labs and IDE incumbents already operate.

Recent rounds in AI Agents

All rounds →
Date Startup Round Amount
Jun 2026 Lassie Series A $35M
May 2026 Cognition Series D $1B
May 2026 Flick Seed $6M
May 2026 Outmarket AI Series A $17M
May 2026 Vapi Series B $50M
May 2026 Exaforce Series B $125M
May 2026 Moonshot AI Series C $2B
May 2026 Fazeshift Series A $17M

All AI Agents startups

Page 3

Autonomize AI

US est. 2022

Agentic AI orchestration platform for healthcare and life sciences operations

Raised
$32M
Stage
S-A
68

Mandolin

US est. 2024

AI agents that automate specialty drug access and buy-and-bill workflows

Raised
$40M
Stage
S-A
68

OatFi

US est. 2021

API-first embedded credit network for B2B payments

Raised
$32M
Stage
Seed
68

Maisa AI

ES est. 2024

Accountable AI digital workers built on a Knowledge Processing Unit

Raised
$30M
Stage
Pre-S
68

Cognition

US est. 2023

Applied AI lab building Devin, the AI software engineer.

Raised
$2.5B
Stage
S-D
67

Mistral AI

Verified
FR est. 2023

Open and efficient foundation models

Raised
$6.3B
Stage
Debt
67

Keycard

US est. 2024

Identity and access management built for AI agents

Raised
$38M
Stage
Seed
67

Paid

GB est. 2024

Results-based billing and monetization infrastructure for AI agents

Raised
$33.3M
Stage
Pre-S
67

Sierra

Verified
US est. 2023

Conversational AI agents for every business

Raised
$2.2B
Stage
S-D
66

Fazeshift

US est. 2023

AI agents that automate accounts receivable and finance ops

Raised
$22M
Stage
S-A
66

Coverbase

US est. 2022

AI third-party risk and procurement platform for regulated companies

Raised
$20M
Stage
S-A
66

Twin

FR est. 2023

No-code AI agents that automate complex operational workflows end-to-end

Raised
$13M
Stage
Pre-S
66

Lassie

US est. 2024

AI agents that run the back office of small businesses end-to-end

Raised
$47M
Stage
S-A
66

Isara

est. 2025
Raised
$94M
Stage
Seed
66

Sycamore

est. 2025
Raised
$65M
Stage
Seed
66

01.AI

CN est. 2023

Founded by Kai-Fu Lee — maker of the Yi model family.

Raised
$200M
Stage
S-A
65

Ema

US est. 2023

Universal AI employee for the enterprise

Raised
$86M
Stage
SERIES A EXTENSION
65

Clicks

US est. 2025

AI agents that operate a computer like humans to automate back-office work.

Raised
$4M
Stage
Seed
65

Fluency

US est. 2017

The digital advertising operating system with agentic AI for scaling paid media

Raised
$40M
Stage
S-A
65

Quandri

CA est. 2021

AI renewal intelligence for insurance brokerages

Raised
$22M
Stage
S-A
65

Theoriq

US est. 2023

Blockchain protocol for collectives of autonomous on-chain AI agents

Raised
$10.2M
Stage
Seed
65

Hippocratic AI

Verified
US est. 2023

Safe AI agents for healthcare

Raised
$461M
Stage
S-C
64

Basis

US est. 2023

Autonomous AI agents built for accountants

Raised
$38M
Stage
S-A
64

Tarjama

AE est. 2009

MENA's Arabic-first enterprise language AI ecosystem, powering Arabic.AI

Raised
$15M
Stage
S-A
64