Skip to main content
NeuronFeed
CATEGORY

Best Foundation Models AI Tools

128 tools compared · 2026

DeepSeek-V3 reset inference pricing in a single quarter — every other lab is still recalibrating

128 foundation models startups tracked, with the largest concentration in US. Total tracked funding: $403.8B.

Tracked
128
Total Raised
$403.8B
Countries
20
Active Deals
9

Editor's picks

6

Top by score

View all 128 →

Funding by year — Foundation Models

2019 → 2026
$11M
’19
$1.6B
’21
$1.1B
’22
$30.8B
’23
$32.7B
’24
$90.0B
’25
$245.1B
’26

Market overview

Open with the price chart: in late 2024, DeepSeek-V3 shipped a 671B-parameter MoE that matched GPT-4-class quality at roughly 1/30th the inference cost, and DeepSeek-R1 followed with reasoning at frontier parity. OpenAI cut GPT-4o pricing twice in the next two quarters, Anthropic released Claude 4 and a Haiku tier priced to compete, and Google's Gemini 2.5 / 3 family undercut both on long-context. 68 published labs now sit under that pricing pressure, with $293B in cumulative disclosed funding — the most capital-intensive category on the platform.

The two-lab gravity well

OpenAI ($193.3B raised, ~$852B valuation, Series E) and Anthropic ($67.6B raised, Series G) absorb most of the western enterprise spend. Mistral AI ($6.3B raised including debt, France) holds the European open-weight position; Black Forest Labs ships frontier image generation from Germany. China runs a parallel stack: Zhipu AI ($1.49B, GLM-4 family) and MiniMax ($2.2B, IPO'd, Hailuo video plus Talkie) compete inside markets the western labs cannot serve directly. Behind them, Cohere ($1.77B Series E ext.), AI21 Labs ($336M Series C), 01.AI ($200M Series A, Yi family), and Reka AI ($180M Series B) defend narrower enterprise and multimodal slices.

The cost compression below

DeepSeek's reported $5.6M training run for V3 — even with the usual caveats about hardware accounting — broke the assumption that frontier-class quality required nine-figure compute spend. Llama 4 from Meta extended the open-weight pressure. Liquid AI ($300M Series B) is going the other direction with state-space architectures aimed at edge and on-device deployment. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) and Physical Intelligence ($735M Series B) are training models for robotics, where the data bottleneck is the moat, not the GPU budget. 20 disclosed rounds in the trailing 12 months averaged $9.5B — the highest of any NeuronFeed category and an order of magnitude above the platform median.

What 2026 actually tests

Whether scaling laws hold above $1B per training run. Ineffable Intelligence raised $1.1B at seed on a pure scaling thesis. Safe Superintelligence raised $3B Series B for the same. If quality-per-dollar keeps compressing the way DeepSeek and Mistral have shown, the value moves to whoever owns distribution, fine-tuning, and proprietary data. If the next training generation produces another step-change, capital concentration tightens further.

Key trends 2026

  • DeepSeek-V3/R1 reset the cost curve. A reported $5.6M training run for V3 plus reasoning parity from R1 forced GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini price cuts in 2025 — every economics deck in the category was rewritten.
  • Open-weight pressure is now a constant. Mistral ($6.3B), Llama 4, DeepSeek, and 01.AI's Yi family ship competitive weights on staggered cadence; closed-source labs price against the best open release each quarter.
  • Robotics models are the next data moat. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) and Physical Intelligence ($735M) train on physical-world data nobody else has — the bottleneck is sensors and demonstrations, not GPUs.
  • Average round size dwarfs every other category. $9.5B average across 20 disclosed rounds — frontier-model training is still the single most capital-intensive activity in tech.

Benchmarks vs global

Total funding tracked
$293B
largest of any category by capital ↑
Avg round (last 12mo)
$9.5B
order of magnitude above platform median ↑
DeepSeek-V3 reported training cost
~$5.6M
forced GPT-4o / Claude / Gemini price cuts ↓
Companies tracked
68
24 US HQs (37%), 6 China —

Top countries

By startup count

Stage breakdown

Latest round type
  • Series A 24
  • Seed 21
  • Series B 19
  • Series C 7
  • Series E 5
  • Other 5
  • Series F 3
  • IPO 3

Top investors backing Foundation Models

See all →

FAQ

Frequently asked

Did DeepSeek-V3 actually train for $5.6M?
The figure DeepSeek published refers to the final pretraining run on H800s and excludes prior research, ablations, and infrastructure amortization. Independent estimates put the all-in cost at $50M-$100M+, still an order of magnitude below frontier western labs. The 2025 pricing reaction from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google confirms the market took the implied efficiency seriously regardless of how the headline number is parsed.
Where does GPT-5 fit relative to Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 / 3?
GPT-5 leads on agent-trace reasoning benchmarks; Claude 4 (Opus and Sonnet 4.5) leads on coding-specific eval suites including SWE-Bench Verified; Gemini 2.5 / 3 leads on long-context retrieval and multimodal reasoning at scale. Pricing has converged: all three frontier families now ship Haiku/mini/Flash tiers priced within roughly 2x of each other for comparable capability.
Why is Mistral the only European frontier lab at scale?
Capital and timing. Mistral closed €600M+ rounds early enough to assemble a frontier training team and shipped open-weight Mixtral and Mistral Large before EU AI Act compliance overhead made greenfield labs harder to fund. Black Forest Labs (Germany) holds image generation; Aleph Alpha pivoted to enterprise sovereignty plays. The European thesis now rests on open weights, sovereign deployment, and regulatory positioning rather than chasing frontier text directly.
Will the frontier club stay small?
The capital trend says yes; the efficiency trend says no. $9.5B average rounds and $293B cumulative funding favor incumbents. Distillation, MoE efficiency, DeepSeek-class training tricks, and open-weight catch-up cycles work the other way. The 2026 question is whether the gap to frontier compresses faster than the cost to reach it grows. So far in 2025-26, the compression has been winning.
Where do robotics foundation models like Skild and Physical Intelligence fit?
They sit in this category because they train large pretrained models from scratch — just on physical-world data instead of text. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) is building a generalist robot brain; Physical Intelligence ($735M Series B) ships pi-class models for manipulation. The economics differ: data acquisition (teleoperation, sim-to-real) is the bottleneck rather than GPU spend, which is why their cap tables look more like deep-tech rounds than text-LLM mega-rounds.

Recent rounds in Foundation Models

All rounds →
Date Startup Round Amount
— Together AI Series C $800M
Sep 2026 Crusoe Series F $3.9B
Sep 2026 Crusoe Other $3B
Aug 2026 Generalist AI Series B $200M
Aug 2026 Groq Other $350M
Aug 2026 Etched Other $700M
Jul 2026 Nous Research Other $75M
Jun 2026 Generalist AI Series B $400M

All Foundation Models startups

Page 5

ELYZA

JP est. 2020

ELYZA is an AI company focused on Deep Learning, developing proprietary large language models and supporting major corporations in their LLM adoption.

35

Pleias

France est. 2024

Paris lab training small open models on fully open, rights-cleared data

35

Fundamental

AI research company with a new approach to big data analysis

Raised
$255M
Stage
S-A
35

Flapping Airplanes

Frontier data efficiency lab researching AI that learns more from less

Raised
$180M
Stage
Seed
35

Goodfire

AI interpretability research lab making neural networks understandable and editable

Raised
$150M
Stage
S-B
34

PaleBlueDot AI

Global AI compute platform scaling infrastructure for training and inference

Raised
$150M
Stage
S-B
34

HUMAIN

SA

We build the entire AI stack: data centers, cloud, models, and applications, providing end-to-end AI solutions.

33

ModelBest

China est. 2022

Tsinghua-born unicorn behind the MiniCPM efficient edge AI models

Stage
S-E
33

RBC Borealis AI

CA

Revolutionizing finance through world-class AI research, solutions, and a resilient data platform.

32

ServiceNow AI Research

US

Shaping the future of work with AI by advancing enterprise intelligence through human-centered and scalable solutions.

Stage
PUBLIC-COMPANY
32

Perceptron AI

United States est. 2024

Foundation models for real-time multimodal intelligence in the physical world

32

ByteDance

China est. 2012

Chinese tech giant behind TikTok, CapCut, Doubao, and Seedance AI models

32

Qwen

China est. 2023

Alibaba Cloud's Tongyi Qianwen family of open and proprietary LLMs

31

Krafton AI

KR

Deep research at the highest level, developing multimodal foundation models for immersive user experiences in gaming and beyond.

30

Seedance

China est. 2025

ByteDance's AI video generation model with native audio and multi-shot output

30

Chai AI

US est. 2021

Social AI platform for chatting with AI characters

29

Latent Labs

GB

Building frontier generative AI models that capture the fundamentals of biology to make biology programmable.

28

EleutherAI

United States est. 2020

Non-profit open-source AI research lab behind GPT-J, GPT-NeoX, Pythia and The Pile

27

Inception

AE

Inception's breakthrough diffusion-based approach enables the world’s fastest, most efficient AI models with best-in-class quality.

26

World Labs

US

Building the next frontier of generative AI with spatial intelligence for understanding and interacting with the world.

25

Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI)

United States est. 2014

Paul Allen's non-profit lab building truly open models like OLMo, Molmo and Tulu

24

StepFun

CN

StepFun offers a suite of AI tools including knowledge base Q&A, image creation, and advanced multimodal reasoning models.

21

CLOVA

KR

NAVER's proprietary large language model, HyperCLOVA X, offers powerful capabilities to solve complex business challenges.

19

Snorkel AI

US

Snorkel AI helps frontier labs and AI teams develop specialized training data and environments to differentiate their models and agents.

19