Skip to main content
NeuronFeed
CATEGORY

Best Foundation Models AI Tools

128 tools compared · 2026

DeepSeek-V3 reset inference pricing in a single quarter — every other lab is still recalibrating

128 foundation models startups tracked, with the largest concentration in US. Total tracked funding: $387.2B.

Tracked
128
Total Raised
$387.2B
Countries
20
Active Deals
9

Editor's picks

6

Top by score

View all 128 →

Funding by year — Foundation Models

2019 → 2026
$11M
’19
$1.6B
’21
$1.1B
’22
$26.0B
’23
$29.4B
’24
$88.8B
’25
$237.3B
’26

Market overview

Open with the price chart: in late 2024, DeepSeek-V3 shipped a 671B-parameter MoE that matched GPT-4-class quality at roughly 1/30th the inference cost, and DeepSeek-R1 followed with reasoning at frontier parity. OpenAI cut GPT-4o pricing twice in the next two quarters, Anthropic released Claude 4 and a Haiku tier priced to compete, and Google's Gemini 2.5 / 3 family undercut both on long-context. 68 published labs now sit under that pricing pressure, with $293B in cumulative disclosed funding — the most capital-intensive category on the platform.

The two-lab gravity well

OpenAI ($193.3B raised, ~$852B valuation, Series E) and Anthropic ($67.6B raised, Series G) absorb most of the western enterprise spend. Mistral AI ($6.3B raised including debt, France) holds the European open-weight position; Black Forest Labs ships frontier image generation from Germany. China runs a parallel stack: Zhipu AI ($1.49B, GLM-4 family) and MiniMax ($2.2B, IPO'd, Hailuo video plus Talkie) compete inside markets the western labs cannot serve directly. Behind them, Cohere ($1.77B Series E ext.), AI21 Labs ($336M Series C), 01.AI ($200M Series A, Yi family), and Reka AI ($180M Series B) defend narrower enterprise and multimodal slices.

The cost compression below

DeepSeek's reported $5.6M training run for V3 — even with the usual caveats about hardware accounting — broke the assumption that frontier-class quality required nine-figure compute spend. Llama 4 from Meta extended the open-weight pressure. Liquid AI ($300M Series B) is going the other direction with state-space architectures aimed at edge and on-device deployment. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) and Physical Intelligence ($735M Series B) are training models for robotics, where the data bottleneck is the moat, not the GPU budget. 20 disclosed rounds in the trailing 12 months averaged $9.5B — the highest of any NeuronFeed category and an order of magnitude above the platform median.

What 2026 actually tests

Whether scaling laws hold above $1B per training run. Ineffable Intelligence raised $1.1B at seed on a pure scaling thesis. Safe Superintelligence raised $3B Series B for the same. If quality-per-dollar keeps compressing the way DeepSeek and Mistral have shown, the value moves to whoever owns distribution, fine-tuning, and proprietary data. If the next training generation produces another step-change, capital concentration tightens further.

Key trends 2026

  • DeepSeek-V3/R1 reset the cost curve. A reported $5.6M training run for V3 plus reasoning parity from R1 forced GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini price cuts in 2025 — every economics deck in the category was rewritten.
  • Open-weight pressure is now a constant. Mistral ($6.3B), Llama 4, DeepSeek, and 01.AI's Yi family ship competitive weights on staggered cadence; closed-source labs price against the best open release each quarter.
  • Robotics models are the next data moat. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) and Physical Intelligence ($735M) train on physical-world data nobody else has — the bottleneck is sensors and demonstrations, not GPUs.
  • Average round size dwarfs every other category. $9.5B average across 20 disclosed rounds — frontier-model training is still the single most capital-intensive activity in tech.

Benchmarks vs global

Total funding tracked
$293B
largest of any category by capital
Avg round (last 12mo)
$9.5B
order of magnitude above platform median
DeepSeek-V3 reported training cost
~$5.6M
forced GPT-4o / Claude / Gemini price cuts
Companies tracked
68
24 US HQs (37%), 6 China

Top countries

By startup count

Stage breakdown

Latest round type
  • Series A 24
  • Seed 19
  • Series B 18
  • Series C 7
  • Series E 6
  • Other 3
  • IPO 3
  • Series F 2

Top investors backing Foundation Models

See all →

FAQ

Frequently asked

Did DeepSeek-V3 actually train for $5.6M?
The figure DeepSeek published refers to the final pretraining run on H800s and excludes prior research, ablations, and infrastructure amortization. Independent estimates put the all-in cost at $50M-$100M+, still an order of magnitude below frontier western labs. The 2025 pricing reaction from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google confirms the market took the implied efficiency seriously regardless of how the headline number is parsed.
Where does GPT-5 fit relative to Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 / 3?
GPT-5 leads on agent-trace reasoning benchmarks; Claude 4 (Opus and Sonnet 4.5) leads on coding-specific eval suites including SWE-Bench Verified; Gemini 2.5 / 3 leads on long-context retrieval and multimodal reasoning at scale. Pricing has converged: all three frontier families now ship Haiku/mini/Flash tiers priced within roughly 2x of each other for comparable capability.
Why is Mistral the only European frontier lab at scale?
Capital and timing. Mistral closed €600M+ rounds early enough to assemble a frontier training team and shipped open-weight Mixtral and Mistral Large before EU AI Act compliance overhead made greenfield labs harder to fund. Black Forest Labs (Germany) holds image generation; Aleph Alpha pivoted to enterprise sovereignty plays. The European thesis now rests on open weights, sovereign deployment, and regulatory positioning rather than chasing frontier text directly.
Will the frontier club stay small?
The capital trend says yes; the efficiency trend says no. $9.5B average rounds and $293B cumulative funding favor incumbents. Distillation, MoE efficiency, DeepSeek-class training tricks, and open-weight catch-up cycles work the other way. The 2026 question is whether the gap to frontier compresses faster than the cost to reach it grows. So far in 2025-26, the compression has been winning.
Where do robotics foundation models like Skild and Physical Intelligence fit?
They sit in this category because they train large pretrained models from scratch — just on physical-world data instead of text. Skild AI ($2.2B Series C) is building a generalist robot brain; Physical Intelligence ($735M Series B) ships pi-class models for manipulation. The economics differ: data acquisition (teleoperation, sim-to-real) is the bottleneck rather than GPU spend, which is why their cap tables look more like deep-tech rounds than text-LLM mega-rounds.

Recent rounds in Foundation Models

All rounds →
Date Startup Round Amount
Together AI Series C $800M
Jul 2026 Nous Research Other $75M
Jun 2026 Generalist AI Series B $400M
May 2026 Anthropic Series H $65B
May 2026 Decart Other $300M
May 2026 Cerebras Systems Other $5.5B
May 2026 Recursive Superintelligence Seed $650M
May 2026 Moonshot AI Series C $2B

All Foundation Models startups

Page 2

Moondream

United States est. 2024

Tiny open vision-language models that run anywhere, from M87 Labs

Raised
$4.5M
Stage
Pre-S
67

Trillion Labs

South Korea est. 2024

Seoul lab building open Korean foundation models and AI-for-AI-factories infrastructure

Raised
$4.2M
Stage
Seed
67

Zhipu AI

CN est. 2019

Chinese foundation model lab behind ChatGLM and GLM-4.

Raised
$2.0B
Stage
IPO
66

01.AI

CN est. 2023

Founded by Kai-Fu Lee — maker of the Yi model family.

Raised
$200M
Stage
S-A
66

Liquid AI

US est. 2023

Efficient general-purpose foundation models built for edge, on-device, and cloud deployment at every scale.

Raised
$250M
Stage
S-A
66

ShengShu Technology

CN est. 2023

Multimodal AI video generation with the Vidu model

Raised
$380M
Stage
S-B
66

Generalist AI

US est. 2024

General-purpose embodied foundation models for physical-world robots

Raised
$900M
Stage
S-B
65

EleutherAI

United States est. 2020

Non-profit open-source AI research lab behind GPT-J, GPT-NeoX, Pythia and The Pile

64

Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI)

United States est. 2014

Paul Allen's non-profit lab building truly open models like OLMo, Molmo and Tulu

64

Pleias

France est. 2024

Paris lab training small open models on fully open, rights-cleared data

64

ModelBest

China est. 2022

Tsinghua-born unicorn behind the MiniCPM efficient edge AI models

Stage
S-E
64

Black Forest Labs

DE est. 2024

Frontier AI research lab for visual intelligence, building production-grade image generation and editing models.

Raised
$300M
Stage
S-B
63

LimX Dynamics

CN est. 2022

Full-size humanoid robots and embodied intelligence for the physical world

Raised
$200M
Stage
S-B
63

X Square Robot

CN est. 2023

Embodied-AI startup building robot foundation models for general robots

Raised
$516M
Stage
S-B
62

Harmonic

US est. 2023

Mathematical superintelligence with hallucination-free, verified reasoning

Raised
$295M
Stage
S-C
62

Spirit AI

CN est. 2024

Embodied-intelligence foundation models for general-purpose humanoid robots

Raised
$435M
Stage
SERIES A EXTENSION
62

Recursive Superintelligence

GB est. 2025

Building AI systems that continuously improve themselves

Raised
$650M
Stage
Seed
62

Perceptron AI

United States est. 2024

Foundation models for real-time multimodal intelligence in the physical world

62

ByteDance

China est. 2012

Chinese tech giant behind TikTok, CapCut, Doubao, and Seedance AI models

62

Fireworks AI

Verified
US est. 2022

Production-grade generative AI serving

Raised
$327M
Stage
S-C
61

Physical Intelligence

Verified
US est. 2023

Foundation models for physical world AI

Raised
$600M
Stage
S-B
61

Skild AI

Verified
US est. 2023

Universal AI brain for any robot

Raised
$2.2B
Stage
S-C
61

Ineffable Intelligence

GB est. 2026

An AI research company building a superlearner to achieve superintelligence through reinforcement learning

Raised
$1.1B
Stage
Seed
61

Nous Research

US est. 2023

Open-source AI lab building decentralized models, agents, and training

Raised
$140M
Stage
OTHER
61