Edison Scientific vs OpenEvidence
Which Research Assistants AI tool is better in 2026?
Edison Scientific
AI scientist that compresses months of research into a single day
OpenEvidence
AI medical assistant for clinicians
Side-by-side
OpenEvidence is the more established option (raised $735M); pricing is comparable on both sides.
| Metric | Edison Scientific | OpenEvidence |
|---|---|---|
| Taglinei | AI scientist that compresses months of research into a single day | AI medical assistant for clinicians |
| Foundedi | 2025 | 2022🏆 |
| HQi | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US |
| Employeesi | 11-50 | 50-200🏆 |
| Neuron scorei | 59 | 63🏆 |
| Total fundingi | $70M | $735M🏆 |
| Latest roundi | Seed | Series D · Jan 2026 |
| Valuationi | — | $12B🏆 |
| Cheapest paid plani | Pricing not disclosed | — |
| Free plani | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free triali | ✓ | ✗ |
| Top tier pricei | Pricing not disclosed | Enterprise · Contact sales |
| Pricing summaryi | Free | 1 published plans |
| Categoriesi |
Capability matrix
Developer-facing capabilities and access signals for Edison Scientific and OpenEvidence.
| Capability | Edison Scientific | OpenEvidence |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✗ |
| OAuth 2.0 | ✗ | ✗ |
| SDK languages | — | 2 (TypeScript, Python) |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Active deal | ✗ | ✗ |
🟢 Strengths of Edison Scientific
- Offers a free plan
- Offers a free trial
- Newer company (2025)
🔵 Strengths of OpenEvidence
- Has raised more capital ($735M vs $70M)
- Higher Neuron score (63 vs 59)
- More mature (2022)
- Verified profile
Which should you choose?
Choose OpenEvidence if price matters most — it starts at Freemium, which is friendlier for teams watching burn. Both Research Assistants tools ship core features, so the cost delta often decides it for small teams and solo operators.
Choose OpenEvidence if you want the most established option — it has raised $735M, suggesting more runway for enterprise features, support, and long-term roadmap. For mission-critical workflows or larger teams, that stability often outweighs a lower monthly price.
Frequently asked questions
Edison Scientific vs OpenEvidence — which is better?
It depends on your priority. Edison Scientific is the leaner option; OpenEvidence has broader feature depth. See the side-by-side table above.
Is Edison Scientific cheaper than OpenEvidence?
No — OpenEvidence's cheapest paid plan is Freemium, while Edison Scientific's is Free.
Do Edison Scientific and OpenEvidence offer free plans?
Edison Scientific: Yes, has a free plan. OpenEvidence: Paid only.
Explore more Research Assistants tools
Contextual paths to related AI startups, deals and rankings.