Which Agents AI tool is better in 2026?
The AI code editor built for productive engineers.
The data + AI company
| Cursor | Databricks | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | The AI code editor built for productive engineers. | The data + AI company |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| HQ | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US |
| Employees | 51-200 | 8000+ |
| Total funding | $7.6B | $5.6B |
| Latest round | Series D · Nov 2025 | series-l · Dec 2025 |
| Valuation | $29.3B | $134B |
| Cheapest paid plan | Pro · $20/mo | — |
| Free plan | ✓ Hobby | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ |
| Top tier price | Ultra · $200/mo | Committed Use Plan · Contact sales |
| Pricing summary | 5 published plans | 3 published plans |
| Categories |
Developer-facing capabilities and access signals for Cursor and Databricks.
| Capability | Cursor | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✗ |
| OAuth 2.0 | ✗ | ✗ |
| SDK languages | — | 6 (Python, Java, R, Scala…) |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Active deal | ✗ | ✗ |
Choose Cursor if price matters most — it starts at Free · From $20/mo, which is friendlier for teams watching burn. Both AI Agents tools ship core features, so the cost delta often decides it for small teams and solo operators.
Choose Cursor if you want the most established option — it has raised $7.6B, suggesting more runway for enterprise features, support, and long-term roadmap. For mission-critical workflows or larger teams, that stability often outweighs a lower monthly price.
It depends on your priority. Cursor has raised more capital and is the more established option; Databricks has broader feature depth. See the side-by-side table above.
Yes — Cursor's cheapest paid plan is Pro · $20/mo, while Databricks's is Enterprise · Contact sales.
Cursor: Yes, has a free plan. Databricks: Free trial only.
Contextual paths to related AI startups, deals and rankings.