Which Foundation Models AI tool is better in 2026?
Sustainable AI cloud infrastructure
Building frontier code models to automate software engineering and research.
| Crusoe | Magic | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Sustainable AI cloud infrastructure | Building frontier code models to automate software engineering and research. |
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| HQ | San Francisco, US | San Francisco, US |
| Employees | 500-1000 | 11-50 |
| Total funding | $1.4B | Undisclosed |
| Latest round | Series E · Oct 2025 | growth |
| Valuation | $10B | — |
| Cheapest paid plan | — | Pricing not disclosed |
| Free plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Top tier price | Reserved Instances · Contact sales | Pricing not disclosed |
| Pricing summary | 5 published plans | Enterprise · Contact sales |
| Categories |
Developer-facing capabilities and access signals for Crusoe and Magic.
| Capability | Crusoe | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public API | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✗ |
| OAuth 2.0 | ✗ | ✗ |
| SDK languages | 2 (CLI, Python) | — |
| Free plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✓ | ✗ |
| Active deal | ✗ | ✗ |
Choose Magic if price matters most — it starts at Enterprise · Contact sales, which is friendlier for teams watching burn. Both Foundation Models tools ship core features, so the cost delta often decides it for small teams and solo operators.
Choose Crusoe if you want the most established option — it has raised $1.4B, suggesting more runway for enterprise features, support, and long-term roadmap. For mission-critical workflows or larger teams, that stability often outweighs a lower monthly price.
It depends on your priority. Crusoe has raised more capital and is the more established option; Magic has broader feature depth. See the side-by-side table above.
No — Magic's cheapest paid plan is Enterprise · Contact sales, while Crusoe's is Paid.
Crusoe: Paid only. Magic: Paid only.
Contextual paths to related AI startups, deals and rankings.