Which Robotics AI tool is better in 2026?
Building general-purpose humanoid robots that work alongside people.
Foundation models for physical world AI
| 1X | Physical Intelligence | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Building general-purpose humanoid robots that work alongside people. | Foundation models for physical world AI |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| HQ | — | San Francisco, US |
| Employees | 51-200 | 100-200 |
| Total funding | Undisclosed | $735M |
| Latest round | — | Series B |
| Valuation | — | $2.7B |
| Cheapest paid plan | — | — |
| Free plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Top tier price | NEO Home Robot Deposit · Contact sales | Enterprise / Partner · Contact sales |
| Pricing summary | 1 published plans | 1 published plans |
| Categories |
Developer-facing capabilities and access signals for 1X and Physical Intelligence.
| Capability | 1X | Physical Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| MCP support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Public API | ✗ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | ✗ | ✗ |
| OAuth 2.0 | ✗ | ✗ |
| SDK languages | — | 1 (Python) |
| Free plan | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Verified | ✗ | ✓ |
| Active deal | ✗ | ✗ |
Choose 1X if price matters most — it starts at Paid · From $200/mo, which is friendlier for teams watching burn. Both AI Robotics tools ship core features, so the cost delta often decides it for small teams and solo operators.
Choose Physical Intelligence if you want the most established option — it has raised $735M, suggesting more runway for enterprise features, support, and long-term roadmap. For mission-critical workflows or larger teams, that stability often outweighs a lower monthly price.
It depends on your priority. 1X is the leaner option; Physical Intelligence has broader feature depth. See the side-by-side table above.
Yes — 1X's cheapest paid plan is Paid · From $200/mo, while Physical Intelligence's is Enterprise · Contact sales.
1X: Paid only. Physical Intelligence: Paid only.
Contextual paths to related AI startups, deals and rankings.